Live demo

Aviation Safety Reviewer

An independent type-certification reviewer for proposed aircraft changes. The agent reads the change, the technical summary, and the safety-relevant signals, then posts an advisory verdict before the certifying authority issues its airworthiness directive. The role exists because under delegation programs (FAA ODA), most of the analysis is done by the manufacturer’s own engineers. Presets include the structural shape of the 737 MAX MCAS certification.

Demo levers
Certification change #2401
Split-Scimitar winglet retrofit
Boeing 737-800
Routine winglet
Summary (manufacturer's pitch)

Retrofit the existing winglets with the split-scimitar design to improve fuel efficiency by approximately 2%. Aerodynamic-only change; no software or systems modifications.

Technical summary (what it actually does)

Replace upper and lower winglet panels per Aviation Partners Boeing kit. No changes to flight-control software, hydraulics, electrical systems, or sensors. Center-of-gravity envelope unchanged. Performance data updates only.

Actuates flight controls
no
Primary-trigger sensors
0
no sensor trigger
Overrides pilot input
no
Proposed training
none
Disclosed in FCOM
yes
Fleet affected
1,200
Review this certification change

The reviewer reads the proposed change, the technical summary, and the safety-relevant signals, then posts an APPROVE, CAUTION, or REJECT verdict before the certification authority issues its airworthiness directive. The verdict is advisory; the authority can still certify.

APPROVE: routine, no safety flags. CAUTION: at least one signal worth further review. REJECT: shape of a known catastrophic failure mode.
Reviewer verdicts
Certification timeline
0 reviews
Load a proposed change above and click Run review. The agent's verdict and reasoning will land here, signed and visible to investigators, airlines, and pilots before delivery.