Live demo

Governance Reviewer

A DAO proposal flow with a Theseus agent posting an advisory verdict before each vote opens. The agent reads the proposal, the calldata summary, and the treasury and voting context; it returns APPROVE, CAUTION, or REJECT with reasoning. Catches governance-shaped exploits a contract has no way to reason about, like the Beanstalk attack.

Demo levers
Proposal #138
Increase grants budget by $250k
Routine grants
Summary (marketing pitch)

Extend the existing grants program by allocating $250,000 from the treasury to fund Q3 community contributor grants.

Calldata (what the tx actually does)

Treasury.transfer(grantsMultisig, 250000 USDC). No admin function calls. Single recipient is the grants-program multisig used for the last six quarters.

Treasury
$184M
Value at risk
$0.25M
0.1% of treasury
Touches admin fns
no
Voting window
72h
Participating supply
41.2%
412M / 1000M
Proposer share
1.30%
long-held
Review this proposal

The reviewer reads the proposal, the calldata summary, and the treasury and voting context, and posts an APPROVE, CAUTION, or REJECT verdict before the vote opens. The verdict is advisory; the DAO can still vote however it wants.

APPROVE: routine, no structural flags. CAUTION: at least one signal voters should weigh. REJECT: shape of a known governance attack.
Reviewer verdicts
Proposal timeline
0 reviews
Load a proposal above and click Run review. The agent's verdict and reasoning will land here, signed and ready for voters to inspect.